[Early to Long-term Results of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Using Clip Device in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation].

Oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation are the standard approach to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, oral anticoagulant therapy carries the risk of cerebral infarction recurrence, not to mention hemorrhagic complications, even under appropriate drug therapy. Surgical treatments targeting the left atrial appendage include left atrial appendage closure( LAAO) and left atrial appendage resection (LAAR). Our hospital uses AtriClip (approved and available in Japan since 2018) as a device for LAAO, and we investigated the early and long-term results of LAAO using AtriClip in our hospital. As a result, stable early to long-term results were expected for left atrial appendage closure using AtriClip device, suggesting that it may be an option that can be considered as a method for preventing stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. But further investigation is required in the future.

Incidence of Acute Thrombosis After Surgical Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion for Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The clinical implications of acute phase thrombosis after surgical left atrial appendage (LAA) closure remain unclear. This study sought to determine the frequency, prognosis, and factors involved in thrombogenesis after surgical LAA occlusion. METHODS: In this study, data from patients who underwent 2 types of standalone surgical LAA closure (either resection or clipping) between July 2014 and March 2020 at a single center were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 239 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation underwent minimally invasive standalone surgical LAA occlusion (184 resection cases and 55 clipping cases). On postoperative day 2, electrocardiogram synchronized contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) was performed in 223 cases (93.3%), and echocardiography follow-up was performed in 16 cases when CT was contraindicated. Acute postoperative thrombus on the closed stump was detected in 35 cases (14.7%), of which 29 cases (15.8%) belonged to the resection group and 6 cases (10.9%) belonged to the clipping group. No significant difference was detected between the groups, and no significant predictors of acute-phase thrombosis were found. Thromboembolism occurred in 4 patients before postoperative imaging follow-up, and there was no evidence of thrombi in these patients on postoperative day 2 CT. Three months after the first CT, thrombi were no longer detected in 34 of 35 patients (97.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Thrombosis can occur after surgical LAA occlusion. Although the clinical significance is yet unclear, it may be reasonable to continue anticoagulation therapy until a lack of thrombosis is confirmed, unless there are contraindications.

A comparison between stand-alone left atrial appendage occlusion and resection as a method of preventing cardiogenic thromboembolic stroke.

OBJECTIVE: The present study evaluated the differences between left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) and left atrial appendage resection (LAAR) in terms of the safety and efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2018 to August 2022, 94 patients underwent a stand-alone LAAO, and 90 patients underwent stand-alone LAAR in our institution. All of these patients were included in this study. LAAO was performed via left mini-thoracotomy, and LAAR was performed via a left thoracoscopic approach. The patients' characteristics and perioperative and postoperative data were obtained by retrospectively reviewing their medical records. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 72.4 ± 10.2 (LAAO) and 66.2 ± 9.4 (LAAR) years old (P < 0.05). There were no marked differences in the mean duration of atrial fibrillation (AF) or the ratio of AF type between both groups. The average CHA2DS2-Vasc scores were 4.4 ± 1.6 (LAAO) and 2.7 ± 1.8 (LAAR) (P < 0.05), and the average HAS-BLED scores were 2.9 ± 1.0 (LAAO) and 2.2 ± 1.2 (LAAR) (P < 0.05). The mean operation time was 49 ± 20 min (LAAO) and 34 ± 15 min (LAAR) (P < 0.05). No substantial gaps were detected in preoperative echo-graphic findings between the groups. No significant differences were observed in the amount of intraoperative or postoperative bleeding or the rate of intraoperative massive bleeding events between the groups. Successful LAA closure was achieved in all cases in both groups. Approximately 50% of patients underwent concomitant left pulmonary vein isolation (LPVI) during surgery, indicating no significant differences between the groups (P = 0.872). The early mortality rate was 1.04% in the LAAO group and 0% in the LAAR group (P = 0.132). There was no significant difference in the rate of postoperative LAA stump thrombus between the groups (8.5% in the LAAO group and 6.7% in the LAAR group; P = 0.320). The mean follow-up period was 851 ± 500 (6-1618) days in the LAAO group and 1208 ± 357 (49-1694) days in the LAAR group. Postoperative stroke events were detected in 1 patient in each group (P = 0.432). There was no significant difference in the sinus rhythm recovery rate after LPVI between these groups (31.1% in the LAAO group and 28.6% in the LAAR group; P = 0.763). CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences between LAAO and LAAR in terms of the feasibility and the effectiveness as a method for stroke prophylaxis only to selected patients for both procedures, although further studies including the comparison between groups with the same backgrounds to confirm the authentic differences in the clinical results between these procedures.